Collect the case packet.
Bring mixed documents and images into one reviewable case without reconstructing the file by hand.
NCM healthcare pilot
From mixed recordsto a report a nursecan stand behind.
NCM helps workers' compensation nurses organize case material, draft from attributable sources, correct unresolved facts, attest to reviewed content, and export a controlled report.
A bounded pilot, not autonomous clinical judgment or blanket compliance certification.
Report review packetNurse review
01Source packetPDF, Word, scan, phone photoReceived
02Sourced draftFacts linked to reviewable materialReview
03Attested reportBound to the reviewed case stateControlled
Unresolved source conflicts and validation findings remain visible before professional attestation.
Pilot productNCM case workflow
Document-to-report and core case-work surfaces exist as a bounded product.
Evidence-ledSources stay reviewable
Draft facts, nurse corrections, and unresolved conflicts carry distinct provenance.
Still requiredCustomer validation
Templates, integrations, operations, and real pilot outcomes need customer acceptance.
The working loop
AI shortens the assembly work. The nurse owns the report.
The product is designed around source correction and professional review, not a one-click summary that hides uncertainty.
Draft from sources.
Build report sections with attributable facts and explicit unresolved items.
Correct the active case.
Nurse-entered corrections remain distinct and revalidation checks the actual report item.
Attest and export.
Professional release follows review, consistency checks, and the selected template gate.
Product behavior
Case work, report integrity, and operational readiness are separate gates.
Case-centered workflow
Tasks, appointments, contacts, work status, restrictions, activities, time, mileage, expenses, and reporting periods can live with the case.
Implemented boundarySource-aware drafting
Factual output is expected to be source-attributed, explicitly nurse-entered, or marked unresolved before attestation.
Implemented boundaryControlled release
Validation, nurse attestation, supervisor approval where required, and exact-content binding keep release separate from generation.
Implemented boundarySecurity, backup, restore, key rotation, and workflow rehearsals have used synthetic evidence in isolated conditions.
A public-source-grounded baseline exists for internal rehearsal; it is not a customer-approved or government-approved form.
A customer template, target operations, incumbent integration, and 5 to 10 nurse-reviewed cases remain external gates.
Clinical and compliance boundary
Local infrastructure is a design choice, not a certification.
HHS describes administrative, physical, and technical safeguards as part of protecting electronic health information. A local deployment must still be configured, operated, and assessed in its real environment.
No autonomous clinical decision-making. NCM supports documentation and case workflow; the qualified professional reviews and owns the work.
No blanket HIPAA claim. Product controls do not replace a regulated entity's risk analysis, policies, physical safeguards, training, or operational duties.
No universal report template. Jurisdiction, payer, practice, guideline, billing, and signoff differences require accepted evidence.
No proven incumbent replacement yet. Real integration and workflow fit depend on the design partner's systems and accepted pilot results.
Public reference points
The baseline starts from public obligations and report patterns.
These primary sources inform the public product boundary. They do not imply agency approval, a state-specific fit, legal advice, or compliance certification.
Practical questions
What a prospective practice should know.
Is NCM ready for protected health information?
The product has implemented security and recovery controls and synthetic rehearsal evidence, but production use still requires target-environment validation, practice-controlled operations, accepted policies, and customer approval.
Does NCM replace the nurse?
No. It assists case organization and report drafting. The nurse reviews sources, corrects facts, resolves conflicts, applies professional judgment, and attests to the final report.
Can it use our report format?
Potentially, after a delta review and validation against accepted redacted or synthetic samples. A named format is not supported merely because a preview exists.
Does it integrate with our claims or clinical system?
That depends on the actual incumbent. The integration contract is defined, but a native adapter must be selected and validated with the design partner.
Does every fact receive a citation?
The integrity contract requires factual content to be source-attributed, explicitly nurse-entered, or marked unresolved. Customer pilot evidence must still measure real citation coverage and corrections.
Is this medical or legal advice?
No. This page describes a software pilot and its validation boundary. Clinical, legal, privacy, security, and regulatory decisions remain with qualified professionals and the customer.
Have a real case workflow worth validating?
Join the launch list for private-pilot updates. An appropriate next step begins with workflow, template, security, and acceptance criteria, not a generic software promise.
Get pilot updates